| LAROK 2340-739 |
|||||||||||||||
|
RAAA #: 68967 CA AR - RA68967 |
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Parentage Validation
|
| Sex: | Cow | ||||
|
Reg Type
:
R
|
Registration Type
B - DNA, parentage in pedigree C - Compute G - Office Use Only F - Foreign I - Incomplete P - Pedigree Only R - Registered U - Genetic Defect Testing X - Export Cattle Z - DNA required on parent |
||||
| Owner: | 025769 DOUBLE FORK RANCH | Birth Date: | 03-01-1975 | ||
| Breeder: | 020345 - SMITH, DICK | Original Registration: | 11-06-1975 | ||
| ProS | HB | GM | CED | BW | WW | YW | ADG | DMI | Milk | ME | HPG | CEM | STAY | Marb | YG | CW | REA | FAT | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
This is the top number you'll see listed under a trait. This value represents the difference that we expect in the animal's offspring compared to others. These values are typically displayed in the units they represent and do not have a set range. |
96 | 75 | 21 | 16 | -3.8 | 23 | 33 | 0.06 | -0.58 | 21 | -10 | 8 | 6 | 21 | 0.17 | -0.09 | -7 | -0.07 | -0.02 |
|
Unlike the EPD Value, accuracies always range from 0 to 100, representing a % accuracy. EPD accuracies increase linearly based on the heritability of the trait in question and the number of records used to estimate the EPD value. As we collect more data, we can be more confident of the genetic potential of a parent animal. |
16 | 31 | 29 | 33 | 33 | 11 | 33 | 13 | 35 | 15 | 18 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 3 | |||
|
This value shows how an animal ranks compared to the rest of the breed, from 1% (best) to 99% (lowest). An animal in the 10th percentile or 10% indicates that this animal is expected to perform more desirably than 90% of the breed for that trait. Lower percentiles are more desirable. |
59% | 19% | 92% | 14% | 16% | 99% | 99% | 99% | 1% | 81% | 5% | 93% | 71% | 4% | 93% | 3% | 99% | 77% | 2% |
|
N Prog is a count of the number of progeny that have been phenotyped for a given trait, which is related to EPD accuracy. Not all data is available for use by the genetic evaluation, so animals may have equal accuracies with differing progeny counts. |
0 | 3 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
Parentage Test
Parentage Tests confirm relationships between animals. They ensure accurate pedigrees but do not directly influence EPD accuracy. |
Genomic Data
Genomic Data links performance to DNA markers, improving EPD accuracy; especially for young animals without phenotypes or in small herds where comparisons to other lines is limited. |
Genomic Prog Count
Genomic Progeny Count is the number of progeny with genomic data. Submitting genotypic data on calves boosts EPD accuracy, as we are able to track the specific genes an animal has passed to their progeny. |
|---|---|---|
| Not on File | 0 |
Genetic
Genetic Defects
Arthrogryposis Multiplex (AM)
Contractual Arachnodactyly (CA)
Neuropathic Hydrocephius (NH)
Developmental Duplication (DD)
Osteopetrosis (OS)
Alpha-Mannosidosis MA)
HPS
HPS - Horn Codes
H - Horned
P - Polled
S - Scurred
Color
Color Codes
1 - Solid red
3 - Black skin Pigment
4 - Ineligible white
5 - Any other
8 - Black hair coat
Owner Details
| Owner | Location | Owner Percent |
|---|---|---|
| 025769 - DOUBLE FORK RANCH | HAMILTON, MT (US) | 0.0 |