| SWANK DORRIE 2509 |
|||||||||||||||
|
RAAA #: 5084533 |
Category 1A
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Parentage Validation
Genomic data on record
This animal's DNA has been analyzed and the resultant data incorporated into its EPD record. |
| Sex: | Cow | ||||
|
Reg Type
:
R
|
Registration Type
B - DNA, parentage in pedigree C - Compute G - Office Use Only F - Foreign I - Incomplete P - Pedigree Only R - Registered U - Genetic Defect Testing X - Export Cattle Z - DNA required on parent |
||||
| Owner: | 114717 JOHNSON, KRIS | Birth Date: | 02-11-2025 | ||
| Breeder: | 008665 - SWANK FARMS | Original Registration: | 05-13-2025 | ||
| Herd Id | Contemporary Herd Id |
Feed Code | Twin Code | HPS | Mating | Color | MPPA | InvSeason | Disposal | DisposalDate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF | SF | 1 | SINGLE | P | AI | Red | S | 0 |
| Birth | Weaning | Yearling | US Wt | US IMF | US BF | US REA | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date | 02-11-2025 | ||||||
| Actual | 55 | ||||||
| Adjusted | 63 | 506 | 800 | 800 | 3.88 | 0.21 | 7.78 |
| Ratio | 86 | 90 | 97 | 92 | 87 | 87 | |
| Ranks | 3 of 20 | 15 of 17 | 11 of 17 | 11 of 17 | 9 of 17 | 10 of 17 | 15 of 17 |
| ProS | HB | GM | CED | BW | WW | YW | ADG | DMI | Milk | ME | HPG | CEM | STAY | Marb | YG | CW | REA | FAT | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
This is the top number you'll see listed under a trait. This value represents the difference that we expect in the animal's offspring compared to others. These values are typically displayed in the units they represent and do not have a set range. |
129 | 71 | 58 | 22 | -7.7 | 53 | 90 | 0.23 | 0.71 | 22 | 0 | 11 | 11 | 17 | 0.45 | 0.28 | 33 | -0.09 | 0.06 |
|
Unlike the EPD Value, accuracies always range from 0 to 100, representing a % accuracy. EPD accuracies increase linearly based on the heritability of the trait in question and the number of records used to estimate the EPD value. As we collect more data, we can be more confident of the genetic potential of a parent animal. |
44 | 48 | 45 | 46 | 46 | 32 | 14 | 8 | 0 | 39 | 30 | 38 | 31 | 39 | 37 | 32 | |||
|
This value shows how an animal ranks compared to the rest of the breed, from 1% (best) to 99% (lowest). An animal in the 10th percentile or 10% indicates that this animal is expected to perform more desirably than 90% of the breed for that trait. Lower percentiles are more desirable. |
24% | 23% | 38% | 2% | 1% | 90% | 81% | 62% | 52% | 84% | 32% | 75% | 2% | 23% | 49% | 99% | 18% | 88% | 98% |
|
N Prog is a count of the number of progeny that have been phenotyped for a given trait, which is related to EPD accuracy. Not all data is available for use by the genetic evaluation, so animals may have equal accuracies with differing progeny counts. |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| ProS | HB | GM | CED | BW | WW | YW | ADG | DMI | Milk | ME | HPG | CEM | STAY | Marb | YG | CW | REA | FAT | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
This is the top number you'll see listed under a trait. This value represents the difference that we expect in the animal's offspring compared to others. These values are typically displayed in the units they represent and do not have a set range. |
103 | 66 | 37 | 24 | -8.6 | 58 | 105 | 0.30 | 1.21 | 21 | 2 | 12 | 14 | 15 | 0.18 | 0.14 | 27 | 0.08 | 0.03 |
|
Unlike the EPD Value, accuracies always range from 0 to 100, representing a % accuracy. EPD accuracies increase linearly based on the heritability of the trait in question and the number of records used to estimate the EPD value. As we collect more data, we can be more confident of the genetic potential of a parent animal. |
66 | 80 | 73 | 73 | 73 | 43 | 32 | 24 | 12 | 53 | 42 | 54 | 43 | 56 | 50 | 47 | |||
|
This value shows how an animal ranks compared to the rest of the breed, from 1% (best) to 99% (lowest). An animal in the 10th percentile or 10% indicates that this animal is expected to perform more desirably than 90% of the breed for that trait. Lower percentiles are more desirable. |
53% | 31% | 73% | 1% | 1% | 81% | 56% | 25% | 85% | 86% | 36% | 56% | 1% | 52% | 89% | 80% | 40% | 58% | 80% |
|
N Prog is a count of the number of progeny that have been phenotyped for a given trait, which is related to EPD accuracy. Not all data is available for use by the genetic evaluation, so animals may have equal accuracies with differing progeny counts. |
94 | 94 | 79 | 53 | 53 | 0 | 1 | 70 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 33 | 33 | 0 | 33 | 33 |
| ProS | HB | GM | CED | BW | WW | YW | ADG | DMI | Milk | ME | HPG | CEM | STAY | Marb | YG | CW | REA | FAT | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
This is the top number you'll see listed under a trait. This value represents the difference that we expect in the animal's offspring compared to others. These values are typically displayed in the units they represent and do not have a set range. |
120 | 49 | 71 | 20 | -4.1 | 58 | 91 | 0.21 | 0.63 | 24 | 2 | 10 | 8 | 16 | 0.88 | 0.18 | 19 | -0.15 | 0.04 |
|
Unlike the EPD Value, accuracies always range from 0 to 100, representing a % accuracy. EPD accuracies increase linearly based on the heritability of the trait in question and the number of records used to estimate the EPD value. As we collect more data, we can be more confident of the genetic potential of a parent animal. |
44 | 49 | 45 | 46 | 46 | 34 | 22 | 9 | 0 | 39 | 32 | 38 | 31 | 39 | 37 | 31 | |||
|
This value shows how an animal ranks compared to the rest of the breed, from 1% (best) to 99% (lowest). An animal in the 10th percentile or 10% indicates that this animal is expected to perform more desirably than 90% of the breed for that trait. Lower percentiles are more desirable. |
29% | 63% | 13% | 5% | 14% | 75% | 74% | 71% | 49% | 67% | 40% | 84% | 24% | 49% | 3% | 94% | 50% | 87% | 89% |
|
N Prog is a count of the number of progeny that have been phenotyped for a given trait, which is related to EPD accuracy. Not all data is available for use by the genetic evaluation, so animals may have equal accuracies with differing progeny counts. |
1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| ProS | HB | GM | CED | BW | WW | YW | ADG | DMI | Milk | ME | HPG | CEM | STAY | Marb | YG | CW | REA | FAT | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
This is the top number you'll see listed under a trait. This value represents the difference that we expect in the animal's offspring compared to others. These values are typically displayed in the units they represent and do not have a set range. |
156 | 72 | 85 | 15 | -2.9 | 79 | 115 | 0.22 | 0.51 | 22 | 5 | 13 | 7 | 17 | 1.08 | -0.06 | 20 | 0.41 | 0.01 |
|
Unlike the EPD Value, accuracies always range from 0 to 100, representing a % accuracy. EPD accuracies increase linearly based on the heritability of the trait in question and the number of records used to estimate the EPD value. As we collect more data, we can be more confident of the genetic potential of a parent animal. |
59 | 69 | 64 | 66 | 66 | 46 | 39 | 24 | 13 | 51 | 39 | 52 | 41 | 55 | 50 | 43 | |||
|
This value shows how an animal ranks compared to the rest of the breed, from 1% (best) to 99% (lowest). An animal in the 10th percentile or 10% indicates that this animal is expected to perform more desirably than 90% of the breed for that trait. Lower percentiles are more desirable. |
9% | 23% | 11% | 32% | 31% | 18% | 38% | 67% | 31% | 80% | 56% | 36% | 46% | 25% | 3% | 11% | 59% | 15% | 40% |
|
N Prog is a count of the number of progeny that have been phenotyped for a given trait, which is related to EPD accuracy. Not all data is available for use by the genetic evaluation, so animals may have equal accuracies with differing progeny counts. |
91 | 93 | 90 | 66 | 66 | 0 | 0 | 85 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 62 | 62 | 0 | 62 | 62 |
Transfer Details
| Owner | Date of Sale | Ownership Date |
|---|---|---|
| 008665 - SWANK FARMS | 2026-03-14 | 2026-04-03 |